COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL OF VERMONT

STATE EDUCATION BOARD

MINUTES

Wednesday, January 4, 2006

Dale State Correctional Facility - Waterbury, VT

 

 

Members Present: Dwight Davis, Richard Fraser, Blanche Kelley, David Luce, Don Messier & Albert Pearce

 

Members Absent: Wilma Paronto & Dave Mulholland

 

CHSVT Administration Present: Bob Lucenti, Director - Stephan LaTulippe, Principal - Maureen McIntyre, Business Manager - Sheila Commo, Program Services Clerk

 

Guests Present: Guy Smythe, Correctional Instructor - Heather, Educational Assistant and student - Mary Haslam, Dale Local Advisory Board Member - Mike Bellizzi, Superintendent, Dale Correctional Facility

 

The meeting was called to order at 9:40 a.m.

 

1. Education Presentation - Guy Smythe, Correctional Instructor


Guy Smythe shared information about education at the Dale Correctional Facility. He is the only instructor at Dale.  Dale houses 45 residents. About a year ago, Dale changed from a sentenced facility to a detention facility. Therefore, most of the women are here for only a short amount of time, and the last thing they are thinking of is education which makes it hard to engage them. This means that flexibility is crucial. The under the age 22 population varies from sometimes none, up to twelve. Classes are offered to all residents. A strength of a small facility is excellent communication among staff, and everyone gets to know and understands each resident.

 

 They have an incentive program that includes hours in the classroom in exchange for weekend visits and packages from the mail. A lot of the older women chose to earn their GED or a diploma from the Adult Diploma Program because it takes less time to obtain for the short amount of time they are at the facility.

 

Interaction between Dale and the Southeast State Correctional facility in Windsor is great. Class work done here at Dale is carried over with them to Windsor and back again, if they need to return. Guy works well with the educators at Windsor, Maryanne Murphy and Mark Lather. Also, there's one caseworker who meets at both, the Dale and the Southeast State facilities, and this works very well.

 

David Luce introduced Mary Haslam, Dale local advisory board member. David also serves on the local board. David and Mary explained how the Dale advisory board serves as advocates not only for education, but other activities as well. They do this for reasons that Guy had explained earlier regarding how difficult it is to get their hands around the education issues.

 

Guy praised the local board for their continued support and advocacy for the women at Dale. He feels that their perspective and ideas are very helpful. Guy went on to discuss vocational and career counseling and how difficult it is set up programs that serve the needs of women who are not there long enough to become established. John Gorczyk, Manager of the Workforce Development Program, is working to set up a Career Resource Center at Dale. They are trying to work on issues like structuring a program that will work with their length of stay and transitioning to treatment plans upon release, housing, job search, etc.  

 

Blanche Kelley shared a newspaper article from the Rutland Herald. The article was spearheaded by the Vermont Children's Aide Society and Vermont Humanities Council.

 

Mary Haslam expressed concern that the inmates are not getting their individual needs met, and that it may be beneficial to have them complete a survey of what their needs are. She also expressed how helpful it would be, if we had mentors that could help see that those needs were met.

 

Guy completed his presentation by saying that technology has made it easier to track the students from one place to another since all the facilities have access to the same database. This makes communication about a student, their hours and credits more accurate. He also stated that the staff is looking forward to the opening of Dale II and the Career Resource Center. Guy thanked the Board for their support and volunteering their time.

 

2. Review of Meeting Minutes & Acceptance of January Agenda:

 

Richard Fraser made a motion to accept the meeting minutes of December 7, 2005. Don Messier seconded the motion. The motion was called and it passed unanimously.

 

Dwight Davis made a motion to accept the January agenda. Richard Fraser seconded the motion. The motion was called and it passed unanimously.

 

3. Meet Commissioner Rob Hofmann

 

Commissioner Hofmann was unable to attend the State Board Meeting at this time due to a scheduling conflict.

 

4. Graduation Statistics and Supervision and Evaluation - Stephan LaTulippe

 

Since July 1, 2005, there have been 55 graduates from the CHSVT. Thirty of those students were under the age of 22. Of those 30, ten of them were special education students. The remaining 25 were over the age of 22. Of those 22, five of them received special education services. Steve handed out a sample of a credit request form, a transcript, a syllabus and student hours to explain the process of how a student earns credits towards graduation. He explained that an average public school requires approximately 70-85 hours of seat time and a class at CHSVT averages about 100 hours of seat time. There is more emphasis, however, on quality of work, not quantity of seat time. GED and prior learning can be used towards graduation credits for everything except U.S. History. A student must have received one U.S. History credit from high school in order to receive a diploma.

 

David Luce wanted to know if students created portfolios to carry with them from site to site. Some portfolios are created but the student's graduation plan serves as the connection from site to site. It was also shared that the education file is separate from the correctional file.  This means that none of the work, transcripts, diploma, etc. carries any mention of the Department of Corrections.

 

Blanche asked about the preservation of student education files. Where are they kept and for how long? All education files stay with the student as long as they are taking classes. When they receive their diploma or are released, the records come to central office where they are filed for three years. After three years, the files are sent to public records where they are retained until put on microfiche. They are available at anytime from the State's public records division, should a student re-enter school. Bob said that with the development of the career resource centers, we will encourage employers to ask for transcripts so that they can see what was learned while a student was incarcerated.

 

Steve handed out a copy of the Differentiated Supervision and Evaluation System for the Professional Teaching Faculty of CHSVT. The handbook is a guide for how evaluations are conducted for Correctional Instructors, Vocational Coordinators, IT Specialists and Special Educators. Steve is responsible for evaluating 38 instructors on three strands of evaluations; Supervision/Evaluation, Colleague Consultation and Professional Growth/Self-Directive Focus. Steve also handed out a copy of a Performance Evaluation Report and explained the process of evaluating each teacher. Evaluations need to be maintained on an educational level in order to keep their tenor in line with the public sector should they ever return to a public school. An evaluation requires a prior conference, observation of classroom performance and a post conference. The State of Vermont requires annual evaluations for all employees.

 

Some of the Board members shared concerns that this may be too much for one person to conduct all of these evaluations yearly, along with other duties. Discussion ensued about what could be done to change the amount of evaluations that need to be done. It was suggested that the teachers would have to be willing to request a change of language in the agreement between the VSEA and the State of Vermont. We could change the language in Article 41 - Correctional Instructors to reflect evaluations be done every two years. Article 12 of this agreement states that State employees are required to have annual evaluations. Richard Fraser feels that the current and continuous contact with the teachers is good, he is just concerned about Steve's other duties and the possibility of burn-out. Steve reminded the Board that the quality and rigor of the program is important and evaluating the teachers is an important way to assure that it is continuing as such.

 

David Luce asked about the ratio of adjunct teachers vs. full-time teachers. He is concerned about the quality of instruction with so many adjuncts teaching. Guy said that the teachers hire and evaluate adjuncts and that course descriptions must be approved by Steve before they may teach a class. Bob said that the advantage to having adjuncts on board included introducing citizens to corrections, citizens becoming desensitized to inmates, they would be more willing to hire a released inmate after spending time with them, and many of the adjuncts have become full-time teachers with the CHSVT. David Luce suggested that an evaluation/survey of the adjuncts by the students should be done at the end of a class. Bob said that some teachers do this already, and he will look into it becoming a common practice for the adjuncts.

 

Mary Haslam feels the need for more volunteers available to mentor and assess students coming into the program. She feels that there are students falling through the cracks who need more one on one attention. Bob feels that there is more need for structure with the outcome being employment. David feels that brings us back to a survey/assessment needed when a new inmate arrives to assess and determine the high needs for each individual. Steve said that self-assessments and WRAT tests are conducted to determine if a student is in need of compensatory education. The problem lies in the fact that the tests are only for under 22's and there is a lot of movement of inmates at Dale. Mike Bellizzi feels that the local board goes beyond the guidelines to advocate for the inmates, and he is thankful for this. Bob and Steve reminded the Board that there are guidelines that the instructors must follow. Mike feels like the smaller facility works well together without overstepping boundaries.  

 

5. Bob Lucenti - Changes in Statutory Language:

 

Bob handed out a copy of the Statutory Authority Title 28 §120. The big issue here is Section e. The legislature had requested a report, written jointly by the Department of Corrections and the Department of Education, to explain how the provision of special education would be implemented at all CHSVT sites, and the cost associated to provide these services.

 

Bob shared a copy of the report with the Board. He also shared that he recently had a meeting with Jim Reardon, Commissioner of Finance and Management Department, Steve Gold, Deputy Secretary of the Agency of Administration and Senators Bartlett and Collins. They discussed how the funding should be obtained for these services, whether from the general fund or education fund.

 

Bob also shared a re-write of our statutory language that was done by the Department of Education. He then shared a list of concerns that CHSVT had with the language changes. He told the Board that he then did a re-write of the statutory language that he felt was more appropriate. Tomorrow, January 5th, a meeting is scheduled with Corrections Attorney, Marie Salem, Jacob Humbert from the Attorney General's office and himself. They will be going over the language changes that Bob made.   

 

Blanche would like an update when Bob is finished meeting with the lawyers. David L. is concerned that we are fighting the Department of Education on two fronts, special education and school status. Blanche reminded the Board that if we were to go back to a "program" all kinds of things can go wrong with it and it really needs to remain a school.

 

Dwight Davis made a motion to keep Independent School approval as our primary goal, not public school approval. Richard Fraser seconded the motion. The motion was called and it passed unanimously.

 

6. State Education Board Annual Meeting:

 

Suggestions and discussion as to where to hold the annual board meeting in March had everyone in agreement to hold it at the Three Stallion Inn in Randolph again this year. Central office will submit a Lunch Approval Request to the Commissioner.

 

7. Board Member Terms:

 

There was discussion about Laurel Butler's position and why she remains on the Board member list. Maybe she never officially resigned. However, no one is sure. Chuck will call the Governor and see what he can find out.

 

8. Old Business:

 

Don Messier was wondering how the press release draft regarding CHSVT successes and its impact to Vermont communities was coming. At the December Board Meeting, a motion was made and passed to do this. It was also determined that David Luce and Dave Muholland would draft the press release. Dave Muholland was absent and David Luce said he had not been contacted by Dave Muholland. 

 

Dwight Davis made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 1:15 p.m. Don Messier seconded. The motion was called and it passed unanimously.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

 

 

Sheila Commo